God is unfair to blame us for Adam's sin
Why are we being punished for Adam's sin? After all,
he ate the
forbidden fruit, we didn't. It's his problem, not ours, especially in
light of Deut. 24:16, which says children shall not be punished for the
sins of their fathers.
Biblical Errancy
Pamphlets by Dennis McKinsey Pamphlet 1 Q2.
Answer:
The simple answer is that we suffer the consequences of Adam's sin,
we are not punished by God for Adam's sin.
We are judged and punished for our own sin, not Adam's.
(Rev 20:12-13 NIV) And I saw the dead, great and
small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was
opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what
they had done as recorded in the books. {13} The sea gave up the dead that
were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each
person was judged according to what he had done.
On p 190 of the Encyclopedia of Biblical Errancy Dennis McKinsey goes into
more detail on original sin and the fall, and quotes Rom 5:12, which is the
usual verse to be quoted on this particular difficulty.
(Rom 5:12 NIV) Therefore, just as sin entered the world through
one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because
all sinned--
McKinsey goes on to say:
The idea that all people are to be punished
because of an act of one, a relatively innocous act at that, borders on the
bizarre and is a living refutation of any belief in a biblical God of justice
and impartiality.
He continues to throw a temper tantrum (argument by outrage which is one of
McKinsey's favorite tactics). He uses the word 'punished', which is not what
Rom 5:12 says at all. He clearly thinks that disobedience against God is a
trivial matter. Justice from God is not what we need, if we get justice we go
to hell, we need mercy which Rom 5:15-21 goes on to talk about.
(Rom 5:15-21 NIV) But the gift is not like the
trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more
did God's grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus
Christ, overflow to the many! {16} Again, the gift of God is not like the
result of the one man's sin: The judgment followed one sin and brought
condemnation, but the gift followed many trespasses and brought justification.
{17} For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one
man, how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and
of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ.
{18} Consequently, just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all
men, so also the result of one act of righteousness was justification that
brings life for all men. {19} For just as through the disobedience of the one
man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man
the many will be made righteous. {20} The law was added so that the trespass
might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more, {21} so
that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through
righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
McKinsey is quite happy to focus on the negative side, but
neglects the positive side. The purpose of Rom 5:12-21 is to contrast the
resulting misery caused by the one man Adam with the resulting benefits caused
by the one man Jesus Christ. Even this McKinsey complains about because he says
'now Jesus is punished for our deeds, which is also wrong' (p51). Clearly he
doesn't recognise a good thing when he sees it. For the Christian the fact that
Jesus died for our sins is good news, if its good enough for God it good enough
for us.
Finally let me quote from Everett F Harrison (NIV Bible Commentary: Vol 2)
If one is still troubled by the seeming
injustice of being born with a sinful nature because of what the father of the
human race did and of being held accountable for sins resulting from that
disability, one should weigh carefully the significance of the reconciliation
statement of Paul: "that God was reconciling the world to himself in
Christ, not counting men's sins against them" (2 Cor 5:19). The sins
committed, that owe their original impetus to the sin of the first man, are not
reckoned against those who have committed them if they put their trust in
Christ crucified and risen. God takes their sins and gives them his
righteousness. Would we not agree that this is more than a fair exchange?
See also:
- Originally Sinful? A
Look at the Doctrine of Original Sin by James Patrick Holding
- Good question...God apparently set
humanity up for failure in the Garden, so doesn't this show Him to be cruel,
schizoid, or psychotic? by Glenn Miller
|